> On 10 Nov 2025, at 02:11, Michael Paquier <[email protected]> wrote:
> While looking at a recent patch for injection points that has resulted > in 16a2f706951e, I have been reminded that the point name, library > name and function name have hardcoded limits, and it is now possible > to have them tested by SQL. While they do increase code coverage, which is a good thing, it seems somewhat unlikely that they will catch bugs given the nature of of the code being tested. That being said they come at a low cost so no objections to add. -- Daniel Gustafsson
