Hi, On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 9:37 AM Michael Paquier <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 06:27:41PM +0800, Xuneng Zhou wrote: > > Thanks for the patch. I also agree with Chao's suggestion that the > > error message better reflects the actual character limits. I > > implemented a patch for that and updated the test patch as well. > > Please check. > > The restriction related to the private area can be enlarged by 1 byte, > because we don't care about the null-termination in this case.
Makes sense to me. > Done that, and adjusted the whole down to 17 where this has been > introduced. It's far from being critical, but consistency could > matter for future changes, including things outside of core. And it's > nice to keep the same rules across the board if we can do so for > testing facilities. > -- > Michael Thanks. -- Best, Xuneng
