On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 3:13 PM, Adrian Klaver <adrian.kla...@aklaver.com> wrote:
> On 9/14/18 6:59 AM, Robert Eckhardt wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 9:41 AM, Adrian Klaver >> <adrian.kla...@aklaver.com> wrote: >> >>> On 9/14/18 1:31 AM, Chris Travers wrote: >>> >> > >>>> I really have to object to this addition: >>>> "This Code is meant to cover all interaction between community members, >>>> whether or not it takes place within postgresql.org < >>>> http://postgresql.org> >>>> infrastructure, so long as there is not another Code of Conduct that >>>> takes >>>> precedence (such as a conference's Code of Conduct)." >>>> >>> >>> >>> I second that objection. It is not in PGDG's remit to cure the world, for >>> whatever form of cure you ascribe to. This is especially true as >>> 'community >>> member' has no strict definition. >>> >> >> I understand the concern, however, if you look at how attacks happen >> it is frequently through other sites. Specifically under/poorly >> moderated sites. For specific examples, people who have issues with >> people on Quora will frequently go after them on Facebook and Twitter. >> >> these aren't a solution looking for a problem. If we just want to look >> at the clusterfuck that is happening in the reddis community right now >> we can see conversations spilling onto twitter and into ad hominem >> vitriol. >> > > Ask yourself, if this was a government agency tracking your speech across > platforms would you be as approving? Personally I find the whole thing > creepy. No one is tracking anything as part of the CoC. That's nothing but a straw man argument. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
