On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 08:41:28AM -0400, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: > I can kind of understand why this did not make the cut: > > https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=41d69e6d > > (Add labels to help make psql's hidden queries more understandable) > > ... but I'm in favor (yes, somewhat selfishly to be honest) of listing all > changes, no matter how small. Is there a written criteria or guidelines for > these things? I think the bar is already low if we list things like "improved > tab completion", TBH.
I am not sure how to answer this except to say that I try to list items that are important for the general reading audience to know. All changes are already in the git commit log. If you would like to make the case that listing all changes would be helpful for the general reading audience, please make that case. If you would like to make the case that being most helpful for the general reading audience is not the right goal, please explain. -- Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
