On Wed, Sep 09, 2026 at 12:24:32PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > On 2026-09-09 We 11:47 AM, Melanie Plageman wrote: > > [RMT hat] > > > > We are concerned that there has been no reply addressing these > > reported issues. We urge the feature authors to reply and determine > > whether or not this feature needs to be fixed (or reverted). > > Sorry, my bad. Euler and I have been working on fixes, which I hope to > publish today. There was a slight delay due to the issue addressed by my > commit a12600b762c from an hour or so ago.
I want to clarify one thing before you spend much time on fixes. I don't see "fixes" addressing this thread as a whole, unless you plan to dispute the premise that the feature needs a redesign. In other words, I think the thread outcome should be one of these: - My review erred in determining that the feature needs a redesign. The design is sound and should proceed, possibly with some fixes. - Revert the feature.
