> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 2:40 PM Tomas Vondra <tomas.von...@2ndquadrant.com> > wrote: > > On 11/19/18 2:57 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 12:18:33PM +0100, Dmitry Dolgov wrote: > >> Since it's hard to come up with a concise name that will mention sampling > >> rate > >> in the context of min_duration_statement, I think it's fine to name this > >> configuration "log_sample_rate", as long as it's dependency from > >> log_min_duration_statements is clearly explained in the documentation. > > > > log_sample_rate looks fine to me as a name. > > That seems far too short to me - the name should indicate it applies to > statement logging. I'd say log_statement_sample_rate is better.
I agree, sounds reasonable.
