On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:31:24AM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote: > Can anyone tell me why the solution I proposed is not acceptable, and why we > have to invent a different one instead? The website redirect is good and all, > but doesn't really solve the problem, and I still don't know what's wrong with > just fixing the docs...
Because at a certain point the number of _old_ names in the docs obscures exactly how to operate the current software. We have tried keeping stuff around, and we are very bad at removing stuff. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
