Hi Tomas,
On 2021/01/19 11:52, Tomas Vondra wrote:
I'm going to create the WIP patch to use the above queriy.
Any comments welcome. :-D
Yes, I think using this simpler query makes sense. If we decide we need
something more elaborate, we can improve that by in future PostgreSQL versions
(after adding view/function to core), but I'd leave that as a work for the
future.
I see, thanks!
Apologies for all the extra work - I haven't realized this flaw when pushing
for showing more stuff :-(
Don't worry about it. We didn't notice the problem even when viewed by multiple
people on -hackers. Let's keep moving forward. :-D
I'll send a patch including a regression test on the next patch.
Regards,
Tatsuro Yamada
