On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 07:25:37AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > It looks like we are not getting any consensus on this approach. One > reduced version I would consider is just the second part, so you'd write > something like > > snprintf(lsnchar, sizeof(lsnchar), "%X/%X", > LSN_FORMAT_ARGS(lsn)); > > This would still reduce notational complexity quite a bit but avoid any > funny business with the format strings.
That seems reasonable to me. So +1. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
