On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 1:44 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 01:53:03AM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 08:10:09PM +0100, Matthias van de Meent wrote: > > I think these should say that they report their progress *in* the view (not > > "to"): > > > > > + Each backend running <command>ANALYZE</command> will report its > > > progress to > > > + the <structname>pg_stat_progress_analyze</structname> view. See > > What is proposed in the patch is: > "Each backend running <command>blah</> will report its progress to the > pg_stat_progress_blah view." > > What you propose is: > "Each backend running <command>blah</> will report its progress in the > pg_stat_progress_blah view."
IMO, the phrasing proposed by Justin upthread looks good. It's like this: > + Each backend running <command>ANALYZE</command> will report its progress > in > + the <structname>pg_stat_progress_analyze</structname> view. See > + Each backend running <command>CREATE INDEX</command> will report its > + progress in the <structname>pg_stat_progress_create_index</structname> > view ... ... With Regards, Bharath Rupireddy. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
