> On Mar 11, 2021, at 9:10 AM, Andrey Borodin <x4...@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
>
>
>
>> 11 марта 2021 г., в 20:30, Mark Dilger <mark.dil...@enterprisedb.com>
>> написал(а):
>>
>>
>> pg_amcheck does not need a local data directory to check a remote database
>> server, though it does need to connect to that server.
> No, I mean it it would be great if we did not need to materialise whole DB
> anywhere. Let's say I have a backup of 10Tb cluster in S3. And don't have
> that clusters hardware anymore. I want to spawn tiny VM with few GiBs of RAM
> and storage no larger than biggest index within DB + WAL from start to end.
> And stream-check all backup, mark it safe and sleep well. It would be perfect
> if we could do backup verification at cost of corruption monitoring (and not
> vice versa, which is trivial).
Thanks for clarifying. I agree that would be useful. I don't see any way to
make that part of this project, but maybe after the v14 cycle you'll look over
the code a propose a way forward for that?'
—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
