> > It looks like it wouldn't take too much work to replace > > shared buffers on the basis of LRU-2 instead of LRU, so > > I'm thinking about trying it. > > > > Has anyone looked into this area? Is there a better method to try? > > Sounds like a perfect idea. Good luck. :-) Hmm, how much time will be required? I integrate WAL right now and have to do significant changes in bufmgr... Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] Possible performance improvement: buffer repl... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Possible performance improvement: buffer... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Possible performance improvement: buffer... Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] Possible performance improvement: buffer... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Possible performance improvement: bu... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Possible performance improvement... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Possible performance improvement... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Possible performance improvement: bu... Patrick Welche
- Re: [HACKERS] Possible performance improvement... Bruce Momjian
- RE: [HACKERS] Possible performance improvement: buffer... Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Possible performance improvement: buffer... Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] Possible performance improvement: bu... Bruce Momjian