Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom, did we ever test this? I think we did and found that it was the > same or worse, right? I tried it and didn't see any noticeable improvement on the particular test case I was using, so I got discouraged and didn't pursue the idea further. I'd like to come back to it someday, though. regards, tom lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Possible performance improvement: buffer repl... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Possible performance improvement: buffer... Tom Lane
- RE: [HACKERS] Possible performance improvement: buffer... Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] Possible performance improvement: buffer... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Possible performance improvement: bu... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Possible performance improvement... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Possible performance improvement... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Possible performance improvement: bu... Patrick Welche
- Re: [HACKERS] Possible performance improvement... Bruce Momjian
- RE: [HACKERS] Possible performance improvement: buffer... Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Possible performance improvement: buffer... Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] Possible performance improvement: bu... Bruce Momjian