> (If you subscribe to the ACM digital library, you can get a PDF of this
> from there.) This article argues that standard LRU buffer management is
> inherently not great for database caches, and that it's much better to
> replace pages on the basis of time since the K'th most recent reference,
> not just time since the most recent one. K=2 is enough to get most of
> the benefit. The big win is that you are measuring an actual page
> interreference time (between the last two references) and not just
> dealing with a lower-bound guess on the interreference time. Frequently
> used pages are thus much more likely to stay in cache.
>
> It looks like it wouldn't take too much work to replace shared buffers
> on the basis of LRU-2 instead of LRU, so I'm thinking about trying it.
>
> Has anyone looked into this area? Is there a better method to try?
Sounds like a perfect idea. Good luck. :-)
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
