Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> Depending on the version of Solaris and the compiler flags the third >> argument can be a pointer to socklen_t, void, size_t or int. > I think what I'm going to do is this: The argument is question cannot > possibly be of a different width than int, unless someone is *really* on > drugs at Sun. Therefore, if the third argument to accept() is "void *" > then we just take "int". Sounds like a plan to me. regards, tom lane
- Re: [HACKERS] problems with co... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] problems with co... Martin A. Marques
- Re: [HACKERS] problems with co... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] problems with co... Martin A. Marques
- Re: [HACKERS] problems with configure Martin A. Marques
- Re: [HACKERS] problems with configure Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] problems with configure Martin A. Marques
- Re: [HACKERS] problems with configure pete . forman
- Re: [HACKERS] problems with configure Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] problems with configure Pete Forman
- [HACKERS] problems with configure Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] problems with configure Olivier PRENANT