[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Depending on the version of Solaris and the compiler flags the third
> argument can be a pointer to socklen_t, void, size_t or int.
I think what I'm going to do is this: The argument is question cannot
possibly be of a different width than int, unless someone is *really* on
drugs at Sun. Therefore, if the third argument to accept() is "void *"
then we just take "int". Evidently there will not be a compiler problem
if you pass an "int *" where a "void *" is expected. The fact that int
may be signed differently than the actual argument should not be a
problem, since evidently the true argument type varies with compiler
options, but surely the BSD socket layer does not.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://yi.org/peter-e/
