Re: [HACKERS] WAL fsync scheduling

[Tom Lane]

Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> how about sigpause, and using SIGUSR1/SIGUSR2 to wake them up ? 

> Looks like a winner.

sigpause() is a BSD-ism, and not part of any recognized standard
according to my HP man pages.  How portable do you think it is?

                        regards, tom lane