> Tom Lane writes: > > > OK, we can probably assume that at least one of sigsuspend or sigpause > > is available everywhere. > > #ifdef HAVE_POSIX_SIGNALS should tell you. > > > Now all you need is a free signal number. Unfortunately we're already > > using both SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2. > > Maybe you could dump the old meaning SIGQUIT (externally invoked error), > move quickdie() to SIGQUIT, and you got SIGUSR1 free. > > (That would even make sense in two ways: 1) SIGQUIT would actually cause > the guy to quit; 2) there is a correspondence between postmaster and > postgres signals.) Good idea. Of course, this assumes my idea was valid. Was it? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL fsync scheduling Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL fsync scheduling Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL fsync scheduling Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL fsync scheduling Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL fsync scheduling Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL fsync scheduling Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL fsync scheduling Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL fsync scheduling Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL fsync scheduling Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL fsync scheduling Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL fsync scheduling Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL fsync scheduling Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL fsync scheduling Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL fsync scheduling Vadim Mikheev
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL fsync scheduling Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL fsync scheduling Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] RE: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/access/t... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] RE: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/access/t... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] RE: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/access... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] RE: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/access... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] RE: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/access... Bruce Momjian