Re: [HACKERS] WAL fsync scheduling

[Tom Lane]

Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>>> how about sigpause, and using SIGUSR1/SIGUSR2 to wake them up ? 

> The standard is sigsuspend:

OK, we can probably assume that at least one of sigsuspend or sigpause
is available everywhere.  Now all you need is a free signal number.
Unfortunately we're already using both SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2.

                        regards, tom lane