Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I believe the formatting problem was that some code had > "command;command; : lkjasfd : asldfk" while some had them spread over > separate lines, and others used \n\, all very randomly. Now at least > they are all consistent and use similar formatting. And they may all be broken, except for the one(s) you have tested. You shouldn't be assuming that a platform that uses gcc necessarily also uses gas. regards, tom lane
- [HACKERS] s_lock.h cleanup Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] s_lock.h cleanup Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] s_lock.h cleanup Bruce Momjian
- [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cle... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] s_l... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] s_l... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cle... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.... Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cle... Ian Lance Taylor