> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I believe the formatting problem was that some code had > > "command;command; : lkjasfd : asldfk" while some had them spread over > > separate lines, and others used \n\, all very randomly. Now at least > > they are all consistent and use similar formatting. > > And they may all be broken, except for the one(s) you have tested. > You shouldn't be assuming that a platform that uses gcc necessarily > also uses gas. Oh, wow, I never suspected gcc could work without gas. Can it? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
- [HACKERS] s_lock.h cleanup Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] s_lock.h cleanup Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] s_lock.h cleanup Bruce Momjian
- [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cle... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] s_l... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] s_l... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cle... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.... Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cle... Ian Lance Taylor