Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup

[Ian Lance Taylor]

Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I believe the formatting problem was that some code had
> > > "command;command; : lkjasfd : asldfk" while some had them spread over
> > > separate lines, and others used \n\, all very randomly.  Now at least
> > > they are all consistent and use similar formatting.
> > 
> > And they may all be broken, except for the one(s) you have tested.
> > You shouldn't be assuming that a platform that uses gcc necessarily
> > also uses gas.
> 
> Oh, wow, I never suspected gcc could work without gas.  Can it?

Yes.

In fact, I don't think there is any Unix system on which gcc requires
gas.  There used to be at least one, but I think they have all been
cleaned up at this point.

Ian