Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm hoping it was a problem on my machine -- educate me on > what caused the error Well, that's exactly what I'd like to know. The direct cause of the error is that DROP TABLE is finding that some other backend has a reference-count hold on a page of the temp table it's trying to drop. Since no other backend should be trying to touch this temp table, there's something pretty fishy here. Given that this is a parallel test, you may be looking at a low-probability timing-dependent failure. I'd say set up the machine and run repeat tests for an hour or three ... that's what I plan to do here. BTW, what postmaster parameters are you using --- -B and so forth? regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
- [HACKERS] Beta 6 Regression results on Redat 7.0. Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta 6 Regression results on Redat 7.... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta 6 Regression results on Reda... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta 6 Regression results on ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta 6 Regression results... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta 6 Regression re... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta 6 Regressio... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta 6 Regressio... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta 6 Regre... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta 6 Regre... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta 6 Regre... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta 6 Regression results on Redat 7.... The Hermit Hacker
- [HACKERS] Re: Beta 6 Regression results on Redat 7.... Thomas Lockhart
- [HACKERS] Re: Beta 6 Regression results on Reda... Lamar Owen
- [HACKERS] Re: Beta 6 Regression results on ... Thomas Lockhart
- [HACKERS] Re: Beta 6 Regression results... Lamar Owen