Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm hoping it was a problem on my machine -- educate me on
> what caused the error
Well, that's exactly what I'd like to know. The direct cause of the
error is that DROP TABLE is finding that some other backend has a
reference-count hold on a page of the temp table it's trying to drop.
Since no other backend should be trying to touch this temp table,
there's something pretty fishy here.
Given that this is a parallel test, you may be looking at a
low-probability timing-dependent failure. I'd say set up the machine
and run repeat tests for an hour or three ... that's what I plan to do
here.
BTW, what postmaster parameters are you using --- -B and so forth?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
- [HACKERS] Beta 6 Regression results on Redat 7.0. Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta 6 Regression results on Redat 7.... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta 6 Regression results on Reda... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta 6 Regression results on ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta 6 Regression results... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta 6 Regression re... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta 6 Regressio... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta 6 Regressio... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta 6 Regre... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta 6 Regre... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta 6 Regre... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta 6 Regression results on Redat 7.... The Hermit Hacker
- [HACKERS] Re: Beta 6 Regression results on Redat 7.... Thomas Lockhart
- [HACKERS] Re: Beta 6 Regression results on Reda... Lamar Owen
- [HACKERS] Re: Beta 6 Regression results on ... Thomas Lockhart
- [HACKERS] Re: Beta 6 Regression results... Lamar Owen
