Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The idea behind the load average based approach is > to make the postmaster respect the situation of the overall system. That'd be great if we could do it, but as I pointed out, the available stats do not allow us to do it very well. I think this will create a lot of portability headaches for no real gain. If it were something we could just do and forget, I would not object --- but the porting issues will create a LOT more work than I think this can possibly be worth. The fact that the work is distributed and will mostly be incurred by people other than the ones advocating the change doesn't improve matters. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections based on... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections base... Doug McNaught
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections... Christopher Masto
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections... Jan Wieck
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections... Vince Vielhaber
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections... Vince Vielhaber
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections... Vince Vielhaber
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections based on load ... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections based on load ..... The Hermit Hacker