On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > I'm still concerned about portability issues, and about whether load > average is really the right number to be looking at, however. Its worked for Sendmail for how many years now, and the code is there to use, with all "portability issues resolved for every platform they use ... and a growing number of platforms appear to have the mechanisms already built into their C libraries ... ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections based on loa... Neal Norwitz
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections based on... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections base... Doug McNaught
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections... Christopher Masto
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections... Jan Wieck
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections... Vince Vielhaber
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections... Vince Vielhaber
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections... Vince Vielhaber
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections based on load ... Peter Eisentraut