Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think a reasonable compromise is to turn the ereport() in _dosmaperr
> to DEBUG1 instead. That way it won't clutter any log by default, and in
> the cases where we're actually interested in tracking the problematic
> situation, we don't need to get huge amounts of log traffic coming from
> other parts of the system.
I'm still not convinced what you think the problematic situation is.
It's already the case (and reasonable, I think) that _dosmaperr issues a
LOG message if it sees a GetLastError code it doesn't recognize; that
addresses the problem that this thread started with. Why do we need to
make the success case chattier?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
