Le jeudi 07 février 2008, Tom Lane a écrit : > Hmm, the info on that last page might be out of date, but what it says is > that the only SCMS they really support 100% is SVN. The other ones they > claim support for don't work [well/at all] with the post-review tool.
Maybe this is all to naive to ever work, but I'm thinking a diff extracted from SVN looks perfectly equivalent to a diff extracted from CVS. And svn diff output should be usable the same way any -patches diff? It also seems to me that when a patch is applied, still pending patches may have to get adapted to new head before they can be reviewed. So, what if a SVN copy of CVS HEAD was used for review-board, and automatically updated from CVS HEAD. The diff which won't get cleanly applied after an automatic SVN update would not apply cleanly against CVS HEAD neither, so will have to get adapted with or without the SVN mirror step. If all of this can be made automatic, short of hosting facility & service administration, what's still blocking? > It looks interesting though, and would alleviate a few of the problems > people have mentioned with reviewing stuff that's posted as diffs. And maybe it would ease Bruce's pressure to organize the queues and allow all participants to easily follow what's happening with the patches, without having to digest all -hackers mail and without manual big-table wiki page editing. Is it only a dream? :) Regards, -- dim
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
