Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 14:00:33 -0300
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joshua D. Drake escribió:
I am not arguing any particular solution but home brewing a
solution so people can stay on what is definitely a dying SCM is
dumb. There are so many tools available to us that we *don't* have
to modify, bend, break or if you like, improve that any argument
outside of, "We are used to CVS" is just hand waving and that
argument is sad.
Actually, in using Subversion I've found it broken enough that a
migration to it does not offer that much of an advantage over staying
with CVS.
I repeat. I am not arguing a particular solution. I am arguing against
creating more internal infrastructure and the relevant support
requirements when other solutions exist.
yep - I just got a prototype install of review board running against
anoncvs.postgresql.org and it just seems to work fine at a first glance
using CVS (and postgresql for that matter). So no need for any strange
workarounds :-)
Stefan
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
