"Koichi Suzuki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, WAL format doesn't only depend on WAL itself, but also depend on > each resource manager. If we introduce WAL format version > identification, ISTM that we have to take care of the matching of > resource manager in the master and the slave as well.
That seems a bit overdesigned. What are the prospects that two builds of the same Postgres version are going to have different sets of resource managers in them? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers