Hello

2008/8/24 Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 12:00:01PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> So I feel that the proposal for labeled parameters as such is dead
>> in the water, and that the only usefulness this thread has had is
>> (re-) exploring the syntactic alternatives available for named params.
>
> FWIW, I think the way that python manages named and labelled params in
> a single calling syntax fairly straightforward.
>
> http://docs.python.org/tut/node6.html#SECTION006720000000000000000
>

I will work on default params first and I return to named params later.

regards
Pavel


> Have a ncie day,
> --
> Martijn van Oosterhout   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
>> Please line up in a tree and maintain the heap invariant while
>> boarding. Thank you for flying nlogn airlines.
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFIsalEIB7bNG8LQkwRAu1RAJ0TM9/JMUXZI/A+EtNeKp1KHku4OACfQjVa
> QLr4uM/tzgc2y3lodMi2EnU=
> =OSzx
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to