-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160
> I don't *want* the rule, I just think we *need* the rule because > otherwise sponsors/managers/etc make business decisions to exclude that > aspect of the software dev process. How exactly would you even begin to enforce such a rule? Retroactively pull otherwise vali patches from the queue? Ban people from sending email to the -patches list? > Otherwise we have a patch-and-dump culture that is unsustainable because > a few people's benevolence as reviewers turns everything into a > bottleneck. It doesn't need to mean loss of control for core and > committers. That problem needs a solution, but not the one you proposed. - -- Greg Sabino Mullane [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200809050953 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEAREDAAYFAkjBOdIACgkQvJuQZxSWSsiFoACgoqOgumuuZq6z2HBPSAPZUWHd kS0An2TgFmOLTgdFWuLkpazFbECY4nnz =ZrYl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers