On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 06:05:26PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> "Minimal" really fails to convey the point here IMHO. How about > >>> something like "suppress_no_op_updates_trigger"? > > > I think it means something to us, but "no op" is a very technical phrase > > that probably doesn't travel very well. > > Agreed --- I was hoping someone could improve on that part. The only > other words I could come up with were "empty" and "useless", neither of > which seem quite le mot juste ... > > regards, tom lane > redundant?
Ken -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
