Simon Riggs wrote: > > On Sat, 2008-11-01 at 16:21 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > > > "Well done"? It seems to me that we are right where we hoped not to be, > > > ie with a ton of barely-completed (if not self-admitted WIP) patches > > > dropped on us immediately before feature freeze. Today the commit fest > > > idea is looking like a failure. > > > > > > If we actually manage to ship 8.4 within six months, *that* will be > > > "well done". > > > > It looks to me like there are at least half a dozen patches submitted > > in the last week that are pretty half-baked > > Robert, > > Without review, how can we determine the true state of a patch? I would > guess that you haven't done a review of all of them yourself to > determine that.
I think a complex patch that hasn't been discussed on the hackers list recently, and that has deficiencies reported by the author can be safely described as a work-in-progress that needs feedback, rather than committed for 8.4. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
