Russell Smith wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Yes, my defines were very messed up; updated version attached. > > > Hi, > > I've not done a review of this patch, however I did backport it to 8.3 > (as attached in unified diff). The patch wasn't made for PG purposes, so > it's not in context diff. I tested the backported patch and the issues I > was experiencing with the initial bug report have stopped. So the fix > works for the initial reported problem.
Wow, that is great. I was only guessing on the cause but it seemed logical, and your testing confirmed it. > Will this be back patched when it's committed? This is not something we would typically backpatch because of the danger of introducing some unexpected change in libpq. We can provide a patch to anyone who needs it, or if the community wants it backpatched I can certainly do that. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
