Bruce Momjian wrote: > Russell Smith wrote: > > Will this be back patched when it's committed? > > This is not something we would typically backpatch because of the danger > of introducing some unexpected change in libpq. We can provide a patch > to anyone who needs it, or if the community wants it backpatched I can > certainly do that.
It isn't? It does seem like a bug, which we do typically backpatch ... -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
