go for it, and I'll try and do up a v7.1.3 during the day tomorrow ... On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> current list of 7.1.2 -> 7.1.3 changes. Bruce, are you going to handle > >> the documentation updates and release branding? > > > Yes, just tell me when to start. > > I don't know of any reason to wait... anyone else? > > regards, tom lane > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
- [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Justin Clift
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Marc G. Fournier
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Marc G. Fournier
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Marc G. Fournier
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.... Oleg Bartunov