> I said: > > Okay, I'll wrap up the last couple of back-patches this evening... > > Done. A couple of the patches that I had my eye on turned out not to be > relevant to 7.1 (they were fixes in new code). So attached is the > current list of 7.1.2 -> 7.1.3 changes. Bruce, are you going to handle > the documentation updates and release branding? Yes, just tell me when to start. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Marc G. Fournier
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Marc G. Fournier
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Marc G. Fournier
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Marc G. Fournier