Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I think we are on hold for Hiroshi, right?
>
> Yes. I believe I know which patch he's referring to --- it's the only
> change in src/backend/utils/adt/tid.c since 7.1. If he hasn't committed
> in a few hours I can take care of back-patching it. It must be pushing
> midnight in Japan by now...
That's a couple of days ago now... anything happening?
--
Trond Eivind Glomsr�d
Red Hat, Inc.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Marc G. Fournier
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Marc G. Fournier
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Trond Eivind Glomsr�d
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Marc G. Fournier
