Dickson S. Guedes escribió: > Fujii Masao escreveu: >> (...) >>> Even if we need to have the database in real, I'd like to use another >>> name for it. The name 'walsender' seems to be an internal module name >>> but it should be a feature name (ex. 'replication'). >>> >> >> Agreed. The name 'replication' is more suitable, I also think. >> Any other ideas? > > 'walsender' should be a schema in the 'replication' database. Other > modules, in replication feature, could be placed there too.
Hmm, what is this database there for? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
