On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:23 AM, Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fujii Masao escribió: >> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Alvaro Herrera >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Dickson S. Guedes escribió: >> >> Fujii Masao escreveu: >> >>> (...) >> >>>> Even if we need to have the database in real, I'd like to use another >> >>>> name for it. The name 'walsender' seems to be an internal module name >> >>>> but it should be a feature name (ex. 'replication'). >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> Agreed. The name 'replication' is more suitable, I also think. >> >>> Any other ideas? >> >> >> >> 'walsender' should be a schema in the 'replication' database. Other >> >> modules, in replication feature, could be placed there too. >> > >> > Hmm, what is this database there for? >> >> It's for authentication for replication. This was discussed before. >> Please see the following thread and feel free to comment. >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-11/msg00187.php > > Hmm ... I think this means that the suggestion by Dickson does not make > much sense, right?
Oh, I'm sorry! -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
