On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dickson S. Guedes escribió: >> Fujii Masao escreveu: >>> (...) >>>> Even if we need to have the database in real, I'd like to use another >>>> name for it. The name 'walsender' seems to be an internal module name >>>> but it should be a feature name (ex. 'replication'). >>>> >>> >>> Agreed. The name 'replication' is more suitable, I also think. >>> Any other ideas? >> >> 'walsender' should be a schema in the 'replication' database. Other >> modules, in replication feature, could be placed there too. > > Hmm, what is this database there for?
It's for authentication for replication. This was discussed before. Please see the following thread and feel free to comment. http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-11/msg00187.php Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
