> > > Ok the functionality as well as the menu item are gone. You do realize
> > > it's going to give the impression that we're trying to hide something,
> > > don't you?
> >
> > Uh, what choices do we have? Do we want to update that database, seeing
> > as only a small percentage of bug reports come in through that
> > interface?
>
> There are over 400 in the database. If that's a small percentage then
> so be it, but it's still over 400 bugs that appear to have been ignored.
> Having a place to look up possible problems and seeing if there was a
> solution seems to be a plus to me, but if you don't want it it doesn't
> bother me either way. The lookups are currently disabled, ball's in
> your court.
It's up to the group to decide. If we have a database of bugs, I think
it has to be complete. I think a partial list is worse than no list at
all.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
