> >
> >It's up to the group to decide.  If we have a database of bugs, I think
> >it has to be complete.  I think a partial list is worse than no list at
> >all.
> >
> 
> I disagree. Unless you are omniscient, we will only ever have a partial list. 
> 
> Perhaps more importantly, the more common ones will be in the list, because
> the more often it's reported, the more likely someone will use the bug
> tool. If we develop a culture that says 'if it's on the bug list, it will
> get looked at', then more people will report bugs via the correct channels
> etc.

That is the real question.  Do we want to rely more heavily on a bug
database rather than the email lists?  I haven't heard many say they
want that.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to