On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > >It's up to the group to decide. If we have a database of bugs, I think
> > >it has to be complete. I think a partial list is worse than no list at
> > >all.
> > >
> >
> > I disagree. Unless you are omniscient, we will only ever have a partial list.
> >
> > Perhaps more importantly, the more common ones will be in the list, because
> > the more often it's reported, the more likely someone will use the bug
> > tool. If we develop a culture that says 'if it's on the bug list, it will
> > get looked at', then more people will report bugs via the correct channels
> > etc.
>
> That is the real question. Do we want to rely more heavily on a bug
> database rather than the email lists? I haven't heard many say they
> want that.
The database keeps track of it. When someone uses the bugtool to
report a bug it's mailed to the bugs list.
Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pop4.net
56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking
Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com
Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
