On Tuesday 27 January 2009 02:21:41 Tom Lane wrote: > Then why has *nobody* stepped up to review the design, much less the > whole patch? The plain truth is that no one appears to care enough to > expend any real effort. But this patch is far too large and invasive > to accept on the basis that only one guy understands it and will/might > continue to maintain it.
As one of the earlier reviewers, I think the design is OK, but the way the implementation is presented was not acceptable, and very little has been accomplished in terms of reacting to our comments. For example, where is the SQL row security feature, which should have been designed, implemented, and committed separately, in the opinion of most commentaries. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
