On Tuesday 27 January 2009 16:36:50 Stephen Frost wrote: > * Peter Eisentraut (pete...@gmx.net) wrote: > > As one of the earlier reviewers, I think the design is OK, but the way > > the implementation is presented was not acceptable, and very little has > > been accomplished in terms of reacting to our comments. For example, > > where is the SQL row security feature, which should have been designed, > > implemented, and committed separately, in the opinion of most > > commentaries. > > Eh? Are you thinking of column-level privileges, which was committed > last week?
No. > The SQL spec doesn't define row-level security, and coming > up with something willy-nilly on our own doesn't really strike me as the > best approach. Exactly. But there is plenty of discussion on that elsewhere. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
