Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> IMHO the cut-and-paste way that we usually
>> do it in pg_dump is a whole lot easier to read and maintain than this
>> sort of ?: spaghetti.
> Hmm, so should we try to get rid of them in a more consistent fashion?
If you've got the time and interest to work on the rest of describe.c,
it'd be fine with me. I don't feel a compulsion to go fix the rest
right now, though. It just seemed that this particular query had gotten
out of hand.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
