Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> IMHO the cut-and-paste way that we usually > >> do it in pg_dump is a whole lot easier to read and maintain than this > >> sort of ?: spaghetti. > > > Hmm, so should we try to get rid of them in a more consistent fashion? > > If you've got the time and interest to work on the rest of describe.c, > it'd be fine with me. I don't feel a compulsion to go fix the rest > right now, though. It just seemed that this particular query had gotten > out of hand.
Yeah, I think we can get away with fixing the queries one by one as we go over them in future psql improvements. I have committed this for now. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
