Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Personally I'd be more worried about the unnest(). Also, please
>> schema-qualify that function name; you can't assume anything about
>> the search path here.
> Maybe it would be more elegant to put the search_path into proconfig?
This is psql's describe.c, not a sql function. It hasn't got a
proconfig, and it doesn't seem like a particularly good idea to make
it try to replace the user's search path setting directly.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
