Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
>>> 1. fillfactor.* options are silently ignored when the table doesn't have
>>> toast relation. Should we notice the behabior to users?
>>> ex. NOTICE: toast storage parameters are ignored
>> You mean "toast.* options"? If so, yes, they are silently ignored.
>> Maybe issuing a warning is not a bad idea. Care to propose a patch?
> Any takers here?
I tend to think this isn't a very good idea. It's difficult for
applications to know whether a toast table will be created or not.
They should be able to just set the toast options and not worry.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
